The sample behind this series is, in large part, a teardown sample, and it prices the segment directly. Of 16 pre-1981 homes studied in 11968, builders acquired 13, an 81.2 percent demand rate, and across the sample an older home changed hands at an average of 23.3 percent of the new build price on a comparable lot (Frontier Capitals, 2026). The research worked example states the ratio in dollars: where a new build sells for 4,500,000 dollars, the older home on a comparable lot changed hands for roughly 1,049,000 dollars. Finished prices spread widely, with new construction on standard lots selling from 3,500,000 to 8,000,000 dollars depending on village versus south-of-the-highway location, ocean proximity, and lot size (Redfin, 2026), and the simplified residual illustration in the research places land value itself near 2,000,000 to 2,300,000 dollars on a 4,500,000 dollar new build, before site preparation (Frontier Capitals, 2026). A teardown in 11968 is therefore not a distressed discount category. It is the normal way older homes on valuable ground change hands in this ZIP.

Older Southampton homes among mature trees in 11968 from above at the opening of a report on teardown sale prices
Aerial view of pre-1981 Southampton homes in 11968 introducing the sample prices for teardown properties in the ZIP.

Key Findings

  • Builders acquired 13 of the 16 older homes in the 11968 sample, so teardown purchases are the dominant transaction type for pre-1981 stock in this research (Frontier Capitals, 2026).
  • The average achieved value across the sample is 23.3 percent of the new build price on a comparable lot (Frontier Capitals, 2026).
  • The worked example pairs a 4,500,000 dollar new build with an older home changing hands at roughly 1,049,000 dollars (Frontier Capitals, 2026).
  • The simplified residual illustration values the land under a 4,500,000 dollar new build at roughly 2,000,000 to 2,300,000 dollars before site preparation of 40,000 to 60,000 dollars (Frontier Capitals, 2026).
  • New build prices on standard lots range from 3,500,000 to 8,000,000 dollars, so teardown prices spread with location and lot size rather than clustering at one figure (Redfin, 2026).

How should the two headline numbers, the ratio and the residual, be read together?

The ratio and the residual describe the same market from different seats. The 23.3 percent figure is an observed average: what older homes in the sample actually achieved relative to the new build price on a comparable lot (Frontier Capitals, 2026). The residual figure is a builder calculation: a 4,500,000 dollar new build sale, minus roughly 1,600,000 dollars in hard and soft construction costs, minus a margin near 20 percent, leaving land value in the neighborhood of 2,000,000 to 2,300,000 dollars before site preparation of 40,000 to 60,000 dollars (Frontier Capitals, 2026). The research labels the residual a simplified illustration, not a promise, and this report keeps that label attached every time the range is used.

Read together, the two numbers explain a spread that puzzles many owners. A builder can, in principle, support a land value near the residual on the right lot, yet the average older home achieved a lower share of the finished price across the whole sample. The gap lives in the mix: interior lots against ocean road lots, small parcels against large ones, and negotiated sales against competed ones. It also lives in risk, because the builder margin in the illustration is compensation for a multi season project whose finished price is not known on the day the land closes. National construction reporting tracks the volume side of that replacement activity across the country, though the pricing in this ZIP is set locally by the streets themselves (U.S. Census Bureau, 2026).

For a seller, the practical reading is a band with a method inside it. Locate the new build prices a specific lot supports, from recent sold data on comparable streets (Redfin, 2026). Apply the sample ratio as a first expectation of what the market has paid for older homes against such prices. Then test any actual bid against the residual frame, asking whether the bidder has left room for a normal margin or is pricing as if the margin were zero. The village level application of the same method is in whether older homes in Southampton Village are worth more as teardowns.

What separates a high teardown price from a low one inside 11968?

The sample analysis ranks the separators plainly. Ocean and village proximity is the first driver of residual value, lot size is the second, and the Manhattan second home bid is the third (Frontier Capitals, 2026). At street level the pattern is visible: in the village, along the ocean roads, and in the older hamlet streets, 1950s and 1960s cottages and ranch homes stand between new shingle style builds that fill their lots nearly to the setback lines (Frontier Capitals, 2026). An older home flanked by two such finished builds has its ceiling documented by its own neighbors, and its teardown price tends to be underwritten with unusual confidence because the finished comp is standing on the same street.

Lot facts from the town assessor, dimensions, zoning, and assessed land value, determine how much of that ceiling a given parcel can claim, with many parcels running far larger than the 10,890 square foot sample minimum and some carrying subdivision potential (Town of Southampton Assessor, 2026). Recorded deeds in county records confirm the achieved side of the comparison, showing what teardown candidates actually traded for rather than what they listed for (Suffolk County Clerk, 2026). Automated estimates deserve caution in this segment more than in any other, because a teardown has two values, house value and land value, and a radius based estimate averages them into a figure that represents neither (Zillow, 2026).

The condition of the existing house, which dominates retail pricing, is close to the last variable in a teardown negotiation. A 200,000 dollar update on a 1960s cottage was modeled lifting the price by 140,000 to 180,000 dollars for a live in buyer and by 0 dollars for a buyer who redevelops (Frontier Capitals, 2026). In a sample where redevelopers took 81.2 percent of the homes, that second column is the operative one for most teardown pricing. The one condition related item that does move a builder bid is documentation risk: unpermitted work surfaces at the title and municipal search stage, and a building may not be occupied without a certificate of occupancy, facts a buyer prices as process risk rather than as repair cost (Town of Southampton, 2025).

How does the wider market set the background for these prices?

Teardown prices are downstream of finished prices, and finished prices in the wider Hamptons held up through a slower first quarter of 2026, when sales declined while prices rose across the market in the quarterly reporting (James Lane Post, 2026). That pattern, fewer transactions at higher prices, is characteristic of a supply constrained luxury market in which the scarce input is not demand but well located ground. Every quarter in which finished prices hold while volume thins strengthens the residual under the older homes that remain, because the builder calculation loses nothing on its top line.

The transaction machinery matters as well. New York residential contracts run on attorney review and contingency standards documented by the state association, and the way those contingencies are handled decides whether a teardown agreement closes at its signed price or reopens for negotiation (New York State Association of Realtors, 2026). In the sample streets, where the difference between a signed teardown price and a renegotiated one can reach the documented post-inspection range of 25,000 to 75,000 dollars on older cottages, the contract terms are worth as much attention as the headline number (Frontier Capitals, 2026). The companion report on how much older homes are worth in the 11968 ZIP code carries the same houses through the general valuation frame, while are larger lots in 11968 worth more to builders than smaller lots isolates the size variable within the teardown price.

A completed replacement home in Southampton in 11968 whose achieved price anchors teardown values on its street
Replacement home in 11968 illustrating the finished value that a teardown purchase on the same street is priced against.

How does a seller move from the sample average to a price for his own property?

The translation runs through three documents and one conversation. The first document is the assessor record, which fixes the parcel dimensions, zoning, and assessed land value that determine what can replace the existing house (Town of Southampton Assessor, 2026). The second is the deed history for the street, which shows what teardown candidates and finished homes on comparable ground actually achieved when they last changed hands (Suffolk County Clerk, 2026). The third is the current finished price evidence for the ZIP, the 3,500,000 to 8,000,000 dollar new build range on standard lots and the specific closings nearest the property in character (Redfin, 2026). With those three in hand, the sample ratio of 23.3 percent gives a defensible first expectation, and the residual illustration gives a way to interrogate it from the builder side (Frontier Capitals, 2026).

The conversation is with more than one builder, or with a buyer who can show competing interest, because a single bid measures one firm appetite on one day rather than the market the sample describes. Sellers should be candid about the limits of the exercise as they run it. The sample is 16 homes, not a census, and its average folds ocean road properties and hamlet street properties into one number (Frontier Capitals, 2026). The street level evidence is therefore allowed to overrule the ZIP level average wherever the two disagree, and on premium streets they will disagree upward, while on interior streets they may disagree downward. That ordering, documents first, average second, is what keeps a teardown valuation honest in a market where the same ZIP code contains some of the most expensive residential ground in the country and cottages that have not changed hands in a generation (Zillow, 2026).

What does selling a teardown directly save, in the five documented benefits?

The seller of a teardown candidate is selling land with a house on it, and the five documented benefits of a direct sale map onto that fact cleanly. Privacy first: the process runs with zero showings and zero open houses, no public marketing period in which the whole village can tour a family home before it is replaced, and in Southampton a for-sale sign is a public event on the village social circuit. Flexible closing second: 7 to 21 days when speed matters, or months out with a leaseback when the seller needs to remain in the house after selling the ground, instead of a full selling season or longer for a listed older home (Frontier Capitals, 2026).

No commissions third: the typical 5 to 6 percent, 100,000 to 120,000 dollars on a 2,000,000 dollar sale, is not paid (National Association of Realtors, 2025). No seller closing costs fourth: the standard 1 to 2 percent in seller side charges is avoided as well, and the two together preserve 120,000 to 160,000 dollars on that sale. No inspections or repairs fifth: the property sells as it stands, without the 10,000 to 30,000 dollar repair credits documented in the owner brief, a benefit with special force for a teardown, where every repair dollar would be spent on a structure the buyer values at zero. A teardown seller who lists conventionally pays retail costs to sell a wholesale asset. The direct route removes that mismatch. Owners ready to test a direct price can begin at the contact page.

How can a teardown seller tell whether a bid is a genuine builder price?

A genuine builder price can be explained, and a seller should ask for the explanation. Frontier Capitals is a wholesaler that sources off-market deals to builders, and it discloses that role; it does not present itself as the builder who will construct the replacement. The verification steps in this research are the same for every bidder. Proof of funds in the buyer name, dated within the last 30 days, should be produced, and a pre-approval or a private lender letter should be treated as what it is, a different and weaker document. Recorded deeds in the buyer entity name, checkable in county records, establish whether the entity has closed teardown scale purchases before (Suffolk County Clerk, 2026).

The contract then supplies the final evidence. Earnest money of typically 1 percent or more, forfeited if the buyer walks away, places the risk of failure on the buyer. A contract with no assignment clause keeps the vetted buyer as the closing buyer. The pairing of an assignment clause with a token deposit is the signature of a contract that was never meant to close, and in the teardown segment that pattern usually means the holder hopes to resell the contract position to an actual builder at a markup funded by the seller patience. Attorney review under New York custom is the moment to remove such clauses, before the season is committed (New York State Association of Realtors, 2026). A bid that survives the funds check, the deed check, and the contract check, and that can be explained in residual terms against the street finished prices, is a price a seller can act on with confidence.

Established Southampton street in 11968 where older cottages stand between the new builds that document their teardown value
Street in 11968 showing the mix of older cottages and replacement homes that produces the teardown prices in this report.

Methodology and limitations

All prices here come from the sample compiled for this series, 16 pre-1981 homes in 11968 with 13 acquired by builders, set in a wider study where Southampton ranks 47 of 189 (Frontier Capitals, 2026). The sample figures are sample figures, not a census of every teardown transaction in the ZIP, and the average ratio conceals the wide internal spread created by ocean proximity, village location, and lot size. The residual range is a simplified illustration from the research, labeled as such, built from a 4,500,000 dollar new build, roughly 1,600,000 dollars of construction costs, and a margin near 20 percent (Frontier Capitals, 2026). It frames what a builder can pay; it is not a bid for any parcel. A specific teardown price requires the assessor record, the deed history, and current finished prices for the street in question (Town of Southampton Assessor, 2026; Suffolk County Clerk, 2026; Redfin, 2026).

Conclusion

Teardown properties in 11968 are selling into the strongest documented demand in this research, with builders taking 81.2 percent of the sampled older homes and the average older home achieving 23.3 percent of the new build price on a comparable lot.

The individual price is set by the familiar three drivers, proximity, lot size, and the depth of second home demand, and it is protected at the net level by selling in a format that does not charge retail costs for a land transaction. To have a specific property priced as a teardown from its own records, call 401-219-4207 or email [email protected]. If your home is worth most as the ground beneath it, should its sale be run like a house sale at all?

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the average teardown price in 11968?

The sample expresses it as a ratio: older homes averaged 23.3 percent of the new build price on a comparable lot, illustrated by roughly 1,049,000 dollars against a 4,500,000 dollar new build (Frontier Capitals, 2026). The dollar figure for a given property follows from the finished prices its lot supports.

What does the residual illustration say the land alone can be worth?

On a 4,500,000 dollar new build, after roughly 1,600,000 dollars of construction costs and a margin near 20 percent, the simplified illustration leaves land value near 2,000,000 to 2,300,000 dollars before site preparation of 40,000 to 60,000 dollars (Frontier Capitals, 2026). It is an illustration, not a bid.

Does the condition of the house change a teardown price much?

Usually far less than location and lot size. A 200,000 dollar update was modeled returning 0 dollars with a redeveloping buyer, and builders acquired 13 of the 16 sampled homes (Frontier Capitals, 2026).

How wide is the price spread for teardowns in the ZIP?

As wide as the finished market behind it: new builds on standard lots range from 3,500,000 to 8,000,000 dollars by location, ocean proximity, and lot size, and teardown prices spread in proportion (Redfin, 2026).

How can I verify a teardown bid before accepting it?

Check proof of funds dated within 30 days, recorded deeds in the buyer entity name in county records, earnest money of typically 1 percent or more, and a contract with no assignment clause (Suffolk County Clerk, 2026).

Sources

  • Frontier Capitals, 2026. 189 neighborhood builder acquisition sample: 16 homes sampled in 11968, 13 acquired by builders, average older home price 23.3 percent of new build. Market data.
  • Redfin, 2026. Recently sold homes and new construction, ZIP code 11968, Southampton NY. Market data.
  • Zillow, 2026. Home values and recently sold, 11968. Market data.
  • Town of Southampton Assessor, 2026. Parcel dimensions, zoning, and assessed land value records. Official record.
  • Suffolk County Clerk, 2026. Recorded deeds and parcel records, Southampton NY. Official record.
  • National Association of Realtors, 2025. Typical seller commission structures, Hamptons market. Industry report.
  • U.S. Census Bureau, 2026. New Residential Construction, July 2026. Government data.
  • James Lane Post, 2026. Q1 market report: Hamptons home sales decline but rising prices signal a reshaped market. Press.
  • New York State Association of Realtors, 2026. Residential contract customs: attorney review and contingency standards. Industry report.
  • Town of Southampton, 2025. Building Code Administration, certificate of occupancy requirements. Official record.